Pros and Cons

Views: List of Points Topic Map Slideshow

Tools:  Essay Planner Presentation Planner Printable Version

The return to the 3-3-4 education system in Hong Kong is an improvement on the previous system


ForAgainst

  
The new system will cause many problems for teachers
ForAgainst
     

  
the new system will add an enormous workload to teachers who are already overloaded
ForAgainst

  
this is not the problem of the system itself
ForAgainst
  • such hard times are in fact the necessary result of any restructuring 
     

  
consultations from students increase
ForAgainst
  • students will face many new problems with the new system 
     

  
current teachers may lose their jobs
ForAgainst
  • apart from Chinese, English, Maths and General Education, other subjects are no longer taken as core subjects 
     

  
there is no good reason for a restructuring of the existing education system in Hong Kong
ForAgainst

  
Hong Kong education system has a good reputation internationally
ForAgainst
  • the qualifications gained under the existing system are acknowledged worldwide 
     

  
3-3-4 is a global education trend
ForAgainst
     

  
the USA,China and most countries in Europe have implemented the 3-3-4 system for a long time
ForAgainst
     
  • England does not have a 3-3-4 system, but has a highly-regarded educational system 

  
the education reform is unfair to mentally disabled students
ForAgainst
  • the new system reduces the chance of mentally disabled students receiving adequate basic education in secondary education 
     

  
unfair to students who are not good at maths
ForAgainst
  • there will be an extra year of maths, filled with higher level material, which will cause more students to fail 
     

  
the new system is beneficial to students
ForAgainst

  
there will be an increase of student's financial burden under the new system
ForAgainst
  • secondary school fee will be increased from an average of HKD6000 to HKD7200, university school fee will be increase from HKD42100 to around HKD50000, per year 

  
the government will provide grants and loans
ForAgainst
     
  • grants and loans are not a sustainable manner in solving the problem, since the budget reserve is vary from time to time 

  
four years of tertiary education allows students to have more time to specialize in the subject matter they are interested in
ForAgainst
     
  • not all subjects need four years tertiary education 

  
the newly inserted General Education into secondary education under the new system is an improvement of the old syllabus
ForAgainst

  
students will become more critical and open-minded
ForAgainst
     

  
students will be educated with wide range of topics which are closely related to the external world they are living in, such as political and cultural issues
ForAgainst
     

  
General Education will lead to a decline in the quality of students and education
ForAgainst
     

  
in order to increase student's chance in entering university where vacancies are limited, schools may only ask students to do assessment easy to get high marks
ForAgainst
     
  • Yes, it is possible, but there is no guarantee of "High Score" with easier questions, since it tests your critical thinking not standard answers.  

  
students will lose focus of their study
ForAgainst
     

  
General Education will indeed cause many problems to teaching and learning
ForAgainst
     

  
it is difficult to prepare the teaching materials
ForAgainst
  • the terms General Education and Liberal Studies are so vague that they can be seen as covering any issue 
     

  
students will be educated with respect to the ideal of independent thinking
ForAgainst
  • However, biased teaching and learning material will mislead students' mindset. 
     

  
assessment of performance in General Education, which will be partly done by the school themselves, which is unfair to students
ForAgainst
  • assessment of performance in General Education is likely to be subjective and personal 
  • teachers' assessment scheme has long been used for AL subjects like Chemistry and Biology and CE subjects like fine arts 

  
it is an improvement to the old way of examination-oriented thinking which has been under severe criticism for a long time
ForAgainst
     

  
the ultimate goal of general education is a healthy body and a healthy mind, not examination results
ForAgainst
     
  • the ultimate goal of general education is a good job, and these are competitive, and based a lot on exam results
  • it is self-defeating for General Education to be included as a core subject of the public examination under the new system 

  
the new system is more beneficial to the all-round development of students
ForAgainst
     

  
under the new system, the students will have more free time to engage in extra-curricular activities
ForAgainst
  • students are only asked to enrol in six subjects under the new system 
  • unless extra-curricular activities are taken into account in the university entrance requrements, students will ignore them and concentrate on their studies 

  
the students are granted more freedom and flexibility under the new system
ForAgainst
     

  
the students will be allow to make their own combinations of subjects ranging from sciences, arts and business according to their own interests
ForAgainst
     

  
unpopular but traditional subjects will be eventually eliminated because of not enough enrollment
ForAgainst
     
  • this only means a progressive evolution of the syllabus of schooling 

  
the student will feel less pressure in their secondary school life
ForAgainst
  • they only have to go for one public examination instead of two as requested in the previous system 

  
the student in fact feel more pressure under the new system
ForAgainst
     

  
more candidates will compete for the university vacancies under the new system
ForAgainst
  • with two examinations in the previous system, unqualified students were first filtered out at HKCEE level 
     

  
in replacing two public examinations with one, this single examination matters much more to themselves and their future
ForAgainst
     

  
two separate examinations give the student a more thorough assessment
ForAgainst
  • under the previous system, those who fail in the first examination (HKCEE) simply won't have the chance to go for the second (HKAL)