Points:
Wikipedia is a useful source of information for university students - because: its coverage is broad and encyclopedic in scope
 - because: it has more than 1 million articles on wide-ranging topics
 - Problem: there is no hierarchy of knowledge (Wikipedia (2019))
- Solution: there are portals and categories
- Problem: they don't tell users which information is more important to know
- but: comparing information importance is not the function of an encyclopedia
- because: Wikipedia gives a general information for the students, the information can be use as a covered introduction, not for the reference propose.
- but: it is also bias
 - but: Wikipedia has an official Neutral Point of View policy (Wikipedia (2019))
 - but: Wikipedia articles rarely ascend to the desired level of neutrality
- Cause: all articles are edited by people
- because: people are inherently biased
- because: it aims to describe disputes rather than to take sides in them
- but: it uses a program called WikiScanner to detect bias (Wikipedia, 2009, Reliability of Wikipedia, Section 3.3)
- because: it reflects the viewpoints and interests of those who write it
- but: there can be many authors, so the text is less biased to one opinion
- but: all writing reflects the biases of the author(s) to some degree
- but: many schools do not allow their students to use Wikipedia as sources
- Problem: its information lacks authority
- Solution: users can verify its information with other sources
- but: schools should not forbid the use of Wikipedia as a source
- because: if students get inaccurate information from Wikipedia, it is a chance for them to contribute by correcting it and giving a reference
- because: if students get inaccurate information from Wikipedia, it is an opportunity to educate them on fact checking
- because: forbidding the use of a source of information is censorship
- because: its entries invariably show up on the first page of a Google search
- but: Wikipedia can be edited by everyone, it hasn't any credit for students.
- but: some of its information may be inaccurate or misleading
 - because: anyone can create and edit its content
 - but: inaccurate entries are quickly corrected by editors who monitor pages (Wikipedia (2019))
 - but: You can never be sure that the latest version is absolutely correct
- but: you can never be sure that any information is correct unless you check it
- but: the democratic and timely way in which content is created and revised adds value to Wikipedia (Wallace (2005) )
| 47 hits by logged in students since 18 Feb 2009
|