Pros and Cons

Views: List of Points Topic Map Slideshow

Tools: Essay Planner Presentation Planner Printable Version

Voluntary euthanasia should be legalized
For	Against
(co) Anything that is morally acceptable is legally acceptable voluntary euthanasia should be legalized because for someone who i sufferin from bad diseases, death maybe the bes choice. Euthanasia is necessary for the fair distribution of health resources Euthanasia is morally acceptable	Euthanasia gives too much power to doctors Accepting euthanasia accepts that some lives (those of the disabled or sick) worth less than others Proper palliative care makes euthanasia unnecessary Suffering may have value (co) Doctors should not be allowed to decide when people die Life should not be given up under any circumstance It is impossible to draft laws and guidelines that will prevent the abuse of euthanasia

Euthanasia gives too much power to doctors
For	Against
	Decisions about euthanasia made within a properly regulated structure and with proper safeguards should be acceptable In most cases the decision will be taken by the patient, the doctor only provides information to the patient to help him or her

Proper palliative care makes euthanasia unnecessary
For	Against
Competent palliative care may well be enough to prevent a person feeling any need to contemplate euthanasia	Palliative care is not always an adequate solution

Palliative care is not always an adequate solution
For	Against
Palliative care is available to only a small proportion of the terminally ill and in the very last stage of the illness Even high quality palliative care commonly exacts a price in the form of side effects such as nausea, incontinence Not everyone wishes to avail themselves of palliative or hospice care Some patients don’t have their pain properly relieved during the terminal phase of their illness, despite good palliative care

Palliative care is available to only a small proportion of the terminally ill and in the very last stage of the illness
For	Against
	We must take care of everyone in the community though they may be small gruops.

Not everyone wishes to avail themselves of palliative or hospice care
For	Against
Some people would prefer to die rather than living in a state of helplessness and distress, regardless of what is available in terms of pain-killing Some patients fear that palliative care would leave them semi-anaesthetized Other patients will not wish to have palliative care if that means that they have to die in a hospital and not at home Some patients prefer death to dependency

Some people would prefer to die rather than living in a state of helplessness and distress, regardless of what is available in terms of pain-killing
For	Against
For many dying patients, the major source of distress is having their autonomous wished frustrated instead of bodily suffering

Some patients fear that palliative care would leave them semi-anaesthetized
For	Against
Some patients would prefer to die while they are fully alert and able to say goodbye to their family

Some patients prefer death to dependency
For	Against
These patients hate relying on other people for all their bodily functions, and the consequent loss of privacy and dignity

Competent palliative care may well be enough to prevent a person feeling any need to contemplate euthanasia
For	Against
Pros and cons to palliative care

Suffering may have value
For	Against
	You have given no explanation to this to support your fierce assumption.

(co) Doctors should not be allowed to decide when people die
For	Against
	Doctors take this sort of decision all the time when they make choices about treatment Any medical action that extends life changes the time when a person dies and we don’t worry about that Doctors do this all the time, by the nature of their job

Life should not be given up under any circumstance
For	Against
Human life is intrinsically valuable	Death is not a bad thing

Death is not a bad thing
For	Against
death is an integral stage of human life (co) Being dead is not different from not having been born yet Nobody makes a fuss about the bad time they had before they were born	death is the worst possible violation of out autonomy

(co) Being dead is not different from not having been born yet
For	Against
	death hurts people, not being born does not

death hurts people, not being born does not
For	Against
death stops people having more of the things that they want, and could have if they continued to live	When life is no longer considered as a good thing, and there is no more wants in life, death may not necessary hurt. Being born can also hurt the newborn

It is impossible to draft laws and guidelines that will prevent the abuse of euthanasia
For	Against
Voluntary euthanasia is the start of a slippery slope that leads to involuntary euthanasia and the killing of people who are thought undesirable	Vulnerable patients can be better protected if there were set procedures and rules that had to be followed for euthanasia than they are at present It’s hard to imagine that creating a structure to regulate euthanasia will have a worse result than not having any regulations at all There is no reason why euthanasia cannot be controlled by proper regulation

Vulnerable patients can be better protected if there were set procedures and rules that had to be followed for euthanasia than they are at present
For	Against
Patients who fear that they are under pressure to decide in favor of euthanasia can be able to gain help by initiating the formal procedures

It’s hard to imagine that creating a structure to regulate euthanasia will have a worse result than not having any regulations at all
For	Against
Euthanasia will continue to take place even though it’s illegal, it would surely be better to make it legal and regulate it so as to minimize abuse

There is no reason why euthanasia cannot be controlled by proper regulation
For	Against
An analogy can be sought in the case of murder: laws prohibits murder, but that does not stop bad people committing murders

Voluntary euthanasia is the start of a slippery slope that leads to involuntary euthanasia and the killing of people who are thought undesirable
For	Against
It is impossible to ensure that all acts of euthanasia are truly voluntary	More danger of the line between voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia being blurred if euthanasia is practiced in the absence of legal recognition

More danger of the line between voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia being blurred if euthanasia is practiced in the absence of legal recognition
For	Against
There will be no transparency or monitoring if there is no law

Euthanasia is necessary for the fair distribution of health resources
For	Against
Allowing people to commit euthanasia can free resources to treat people who want to live in place where there is a shortage of health resources	Such proposal is wide-open to abuse: it will lead to involuntary euthanasia because of shortage of health resource this will lead to the abuse of involuntary euthanasia, which has no difference with murdering. A moral issue like euthanasia cannot be validated by pragmatic reason

Such proposal is wide-open to abuse: it will lead to involuntary euthanasia because of shortage of health resource
For	Against
people will be expected to commit euthanasia as soon as they become an unreasonable burden on society

Euthanasia is morally acceptable
For	Against
(co) if an action promotes the best interests of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights then the action is morally acceptable Euthanasia promotes the best interests of everyone involved and violates no one’s right Human beings have the right to die when and how they want to

Euthanasia promotes the best interests of everyone involved and violates no one’s right
For	Against
	Euthanasia may deprive both the person who dies and others of benefits Euthanasia might not be in a person’s best interests People sometimes think things are in their best interests that are not morally acceptable

Euthanasia might not be in a person’s best interests
For	Against
The patient may be feeling vulnerable The patient may feel that he or she is a worthless burden on others The patient may be under pressure from other people to feel that he or she is a burden The patient requests euthanasia because of a passing phase of his or her disease, but is likely to feel much better in a while The patient may have an unrealistic fear of the pain and suffering that lie ahead The patient may be confused and unable to make sensible judgments The diagnosis may be wrong and the patient may not be terminally ill The patient may be getting bad medical care and the suffering could be relieved by other means The doctor maybe unaware of all the non-fatal options that could be offered to the patient The patient may be depressed and therefore believe things are much worse than they are People are sometimes wrong about what’s in their best interest

The patient may be under pressure from other people to feel that he or she is a burden
For	Against
The patient may be under pressure because of a shortage of resources to care for them

Human beings have the right to die when and how they want to
For	Against
One has no obligation in bearing continuous suffering just because of the "No termination of life" (mis) belief held by strangers We should respect the autonomous choice of a rational, competent human being It is a kind of mental torture for a person suffering from the illness like cancer, also people's temper or personality cannot be controlled by the others. Every person has the right to control his or her body and life	It is illegal because someone may make use of this point and try to kill people without publishing. Since we can avoid this, we can not make it legal. Individuals should balance their individual right to die against by any bad consequences that it might have for the community in general The right to decide when a person dies belongs to God

Individuals should balance their individual right to die against by any bad consequences that it might have for the community in general
For	Against
The right to die is not purely a subjective choice but a communitarian decision

The right to die is not purely a subjective choice but a communitarian decision
For	Against
Euthanasia is not a private act, it may produce negative effects on society in general Legalizing euthanasia will result in bad consequences that are practical, such as making euthanasia easier and so putting vulnerable at risk Whatever rights we have are limited by our obligations

Euthanasia is not a private act, it may produce negative effects on society in general
For	Against
Euthanasia weakens society’s respect for the sanctity of life

Euthanasia weakens society’s respect for the sanctity of life
For	Against
Allowing euthanasia will lead to less good care for the terminally ill

Allowing euthanasia will lead to less good care for the terminally ill
For	Against
Euthanasia may become a cost-effective way to treat the terminally ill Allowing euthanasia undermines the commitment of doctors and nurses to saving lives

Euthanasia may become a cost-effective way to treat the terminally ill
For	Against
Shortening the last period of patient through euthanasia is a way of relieving pressure on scarce medical resources and family finance

Shortening the last period of patient through euthanasia is a way of relieving pressure on scarce medical resources and family finance
For	Against
Lethal medication required for euthanasia is much cheaper comparing to continuing treatment for many medical conditions The last few months of a patients’ life are often the most expensive in terms of medical and other care

Allowing euthanasia undermines the commitment of doctors and nurses to saving lives
For	Against
Euthanasia undermines the motivation to provide good care for the dying, and good pain relief Allowing euthanasia will discourage the search for new cures and treatments for the terminally ill

Legalizing euthanasia will result in bad consequences that are practical, such as making euthanasia easier and so putting vulnerable at risk
For	Against
Euthanasia exposes vulnerable people to pressure to end their lives

Euthanasia exposes vulnerable people to pressure to end their lives
For	Against
Patients who are abandoned by their families may feel euthanasia is the only solution E.g. moral pressure on elderly relatives by selfish families, or moral pressure to free up medical resources

We should respect the autonomous choice of a rational, competent human being
For	Against
	We can never have sufficient evidence to justify that a dying person’s request of euthanasia is competent, enduring and genuinely voluntary

We can never have sufficient evidence to justify that a dying person’s request of euthanasia is competent, enduring and genuinely voluntary
For	Against
There are patients who are so ill or mentally confused that cannot make competent choice

There are patients who are so ill or mentally confused that cannot make competent choice
For	Against
	A person can, in advance of losing the capacity to give competent, and voluntary consent, how she is to be treated should she become terminally ill the fact that those people are incapable of agreeing to voluntary euthanasia, does not show that no one can ever voluntarily request help to die It does not account for all of the terminally ill

A person can, in advance of losing the capacity to give competent, and voluntary consent, how she is to be treated should she become terminally ill
For	Against
	It is unlikely for someone to make a competent, enduring choice upon such issue without having yet suffered the illness

It is unlikely for someone to make a competent, enduring choice upon such issue without having yet suffered the illness
For	Against
	The objection is too paternalistic to accept

The objection is too paternalistic to accept
For	Against
It is possible for a person to have sufficient inductive evidence to know her own mind and act accordingly

Every person has the right to control his or her body and life
For	Against
Human being should be as free as possible, unnecessary restraints on human rights are a bad thing