Pros and Cons

Views: List of Points Topic Map Slideshow

Tools:  Essay Planner Presentation Planner Printable Version

Historical knowledge should never be intentionally distorted in society


ForAgainst

  
if history is distorted it prevents people from learning the lessons of history, or distorts those lessons
ForAgainst
  • history should be what it is originally to reflect the past and contribute to the future 
     

  
to deny or distort certain historical truth is a regression of human civilization
ForAgainst
     

  
to convey distorted historical knowledge in the society is a tyrannical practice
ForAgainst
  • everyone, as a rational being, has the right to know the real face of the past instead of being indoctrinated any false belief 
     

  
history is often studied for a purpose, and the purpose may be more important than historical accuracy
ForAgainst
     

  
history may be taught to different people for different purposes
ForAgainst
  • in primary schools, history may be taught to form historical consciousness and social identity
  • at university history may be taught to improve critical thinking and research skills 
     

  
there does not exist any objective, genuine historical knowledge
ForAgainst
     

  
historical knowledge is fundamentally perspectival in nature
ForAgainst
  • whether a event is relevant to the bigger picture, different events are casually connected or not, are all subjected to the interpretation of the historians 

  
even it is acknowledged that the interpretations do play a role in its truthfulness, it doesn't mean that historical knowledge can be entirely fictional
ForAgainst
  • we do to a certain extent, share together a common conception of truthfulness about history