Pros and Cons

Views: List of Points Topic Map Slideshow

Tools:  Essay Planner Presentation Planner Printable Version

Arts should NOT be censored


ForAgainst

  
censorship is redundant
ForAgainst
     

  
if an artwork is proved to be completely out of touch with the reality, individuals in society would reject it rather than be corrupted by it
ForAgainst
  • individuals are mature and rational enough to discern what is good for themselves 
     

  
censorship is totalitarian in nature
ForAgainst
     

  
censorship renders arts into tools of political propaganda
ForAgainst
  • censoring arts appears to be part of a campaign of political correctness intended to prohibit any expression of certain ideas 
     

  
censorship is sometimes necessary to protect society
ForAgainst
  • art that betrays military secrets must be censored
  • art that violates religious values of society should be censored 
     

  
censorship is self-defeating
ForAgainst
  • prohibiting circulation of an artwork can produce sympathy for its creator 
     

  
(co) freedom of speech and freedom of expression are the most fundamental civic liberties
ForAgainst
     

  
the right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment is a necessary condition for intellectual and social progress
ForAgainst
  • beliefs are prevented from declining into mere dogma if individuals are forced to re-examine and re-affirm their beliefs in the process of debate with others
  • individuals are more likely to abandon erroneous beliefs and revise their own ideas if they are engaged in an open exchange of ideas 
     

  
censorship is fundamentally arbitrary
ForAgainst
     

  
there does not exist any objective or well agreed standard to evaluate whether a piece of art is problematic or not
ForAgainst
     

  
the evil of today may be good of tomorrow
ForAgainst
     
  • art is not evil 

  
censorship is ultimately infeasible
ForAgainst
     

  
censorship would do nothing to change the ideas that give rise to the opinions behind the "problematic" artistic expressions
ForAgainst
     
  • in removing the problematic ingredients in individuals' daily experience, censorship helps construct an ideal social environment for the improvement of mankind 

  
censorship is necessary to the stability and peace of the society
ForAgainst
  • without a proper system of censorship, artworks containing obscene, violent message will cause negative effects on individuals, especially children 
     

  
an artist, as a citizen, should be responsible for what he/she does and produce
ForAgainst
     

  
it is inappropriate to accuse that the artist should held accountable for any bad consequence that seemingly results from his/her artwork
ForAgainst
  • the so-called "message" delivered from a piece of artwork differs from person to person, it's all up to interpretation of individuals and society as a whole
  • no matter how obscene or violent a scenario is depicted in an artwork, it does not necessarily lead to actions 

  
positive connection between consuming media violence and subsequent aggressive and violent behavior exists
ForAgainst
     
  • exposure to media violence is so common that it is not surprising that some exposed people are aggressive and violent
  • the connection is merely a correlation, not causation