Pros and Cons

Views: List of Points Topic Map Slideshow

Tools: Essay Planner Presentation Planner Printable Version

Wikipedia is a useful source of information for university students
For	Against
its coverage is broad and encyclopedic in scope its entries invariably show up on the first page of a Google search	many schools do not allow their students to use Wikipedia as sources Wikipedia can be edited by everyone, it hasn't any credit for students. some of its information may be inaccurate or misleading

its coverage is broad and encyclopedic in scope
For	Against
it has more than 1 million articles on wide-ranging topics	it is also bias

it has more than 1 million articles on wide-ranging topics
For	Against
Wikipedia gives a general information for the students, the information can be use as a covered introduction, not for the reference propose.	there is no hierarchy of knowledge

there is no hierarchy of knowledge
For	Against
there are portals and categories

there are portals and categories
For	Against
	they don't tell users which information is more important to know

they don't tell users which information is more important to know
For	Against
	comparing information importance is not the function of an encyclopedia

it is also bias
For	Against
it reflects the viewpoints and interests of those who write it	Wikipedia has an official Neutral Point of View policy it uses a program called WikiScanner to detect bias

Wikipedia has an official Neutral Point of View policy
For	Against
it aims to describe disputes rather than to take sides in them	Wikipedia articles rarely ascend to the desired level of neutrality

Wikipedia articles rarely ascend to the desired level of neutrality
For	Against
all articles are edited by people

all articles are edited by people
For	Against
	people are inherently biased

it reflects the viewpoints and interests of those who write it
For	Against
	there can be many authors, so the text is less biased to one opinion all writing reflects the biases of the author(s) to some degree

many schools do not allow their students to use Wikipedia as sources
For	Against
	its information lacks authority schools should not forbid the use of Wikipedia as a source

its information lacks authority
For	Against
users can verify its information with other sources

schools should not forbid the use of Wikipedia as a source
For	Against
if students get inaccurate information from Wikipedia, it is a chance for them to contribute by correcting it and giving a reference if students get inaccurate information from Wikipedia, it is an opportunity to educate them on fact checking forbidding the use of a source of information is censorship

some of its information may be inaccurate or misleading
For	Against
anyone can create and edit its content

anyone can create and edit its content
For	Against
	inaccurate entries are quickly corrected by editors who monitor pages the democratic and timely way in which content is created and revised adds value to Wikipedia

inaccurate entries are quickly corrected by editors who monitor pages
For	Against
	You can never be sure that the latest version is absolutely correct

You can never be sure that the latest version is absolutely correct
For	Against
	you can never be sure that any information is correct unless you check it