We should reduce the use of fossil fuels

ForAgainst

  
(co) Global warming is bad for the environment
ForAgainst

  
increased melting will quickly drain up water rivers in particular region of which water sources of dry season rely upon
ForAgainst
  • glaciers lose the ability to retain water on mountains in high precipitation years as snow covering those mountains are seriously depleted due to global warming
  •  
     

  
over-melting of polar ice affects the lives of many different animals
ForAgainst
  • e.g. polar bears have ice as their homes; some freshwater fishes, such as Salmon and Cutthroat trout rely on the cold melt water
  •  
     

  
(co) these changes increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events which are destructive, e.g. floods, droughts, heat waves, hurricanes, tornados
ForAgainst
     
  • Hurricanes and rising coast associated with weather in general have little to do with global warming
  •  

  
Global warming causes a rising sea levels
ForAgainst
     
  • Sea levels are not presently rising
  •  

  
(co) reduction of glacier runoff, in some area such as Norway, the Alps, and the Pacific Northwest of North America, reduces hydropower
ForAgainst
     
  • other forms of power generation can replace hydropower; e.g. solar power
  •  

  
(co) these changes may lead to failing crops, hence starvation and malnutrition in some regions, especially food insecure population
ForAgainst
     
  • crop production may simply move away from the equator; e.g. more northern Russia and Canada
  •  

  
Increasing average temperature and carbon dioxide may have the effect of improving ecosystem’s productivity
ForAgainst
  • Deficient carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere causes negative effect to the production of sugar in plants thus hinders their growth
  •  

  
an increase in the total amount of biomass produced is not necessarily good
ForAgainst
  • biodiversity can still decrease even though a smaller number of species are flourishing
  •  
     

  
rise in temperature causes serious impacts to the habitats of animals and plant
ForAgainst
  • this can lead to the extinction of particular species
  •  

  
alteration of habitat is not necessarily a bad thing as a whole to organisms
ForAgainst
  • rise in temperature can favor the growth of some other species
  •  
     

  
Forest in some regions potentially faces an increased risk of forest fires due to an average increase of temperature
ForAgainst
     
  • there is no evidence supporting a correspondence between forest fire and rise of temperature: jungles in hotter places don't have a higher risk of forest fire
  • This may be due in part to changes in forest management practices
  •  

  
The extensive use of fossil fuels contributes significantly to the global warming
ForAgainst

  
Global warming is not actually occurring
ForAgainst
     

  
The warming is within the range of natural variation
ForAgainst
     
  • The annual increase of temperature reaches an unprecedented rating in recent decades
  •  

  
The warming is instead primarily a result of variances in solar irradiance
ForAgainst
  • global warming is not connected to cycles of solar activity
  •  

  
variances in solar irradiance are warming Mars as well
ForAgainst
     
  • Martian warming is caused by changes in it's orbit and axis
  •  

  
fossil fuels can be non-polluting
ForAgainst
     

  
example: pollution caused by coal burning can be removed by filtering
ForAgainst
     
  • very few coal-fired power stations use filters
  •  

  
the use of fossil fuels is a major source of pollution
ForAgainst
     

  
the combustion of fossil fuel produces large amount of pollutants, e.g. nitrogen oxide, sulphurdioxide, carbon, heavy metals
ForAgainst
     
  • modern technologies can vastly reduce the output of these pollutants; e.g. by filtering
  •  

  
there exists cleaner alternative such as nuclear power, wind power or hydroelectric power
ForAgainst
     

  
The use of nuclear power is dangerous
ForAgainst
     

  
Tens of thousands of people have died drilling for, refining and using petroleum. Far fewer have died from nuclear power generation.
ForAgainst
     
  • this may be due to less nuclear power being produced: no figure for deaths per kilowatt
  •  

  
it is expensive to replace fossil fuel with other energy sources
ForAgainst
     

  
big sum of money has to invested in developing new technology as well as building new power plants
ForAgainst
     

  
using other energy source instead of fossil fuel is not expensive in the long run
ForAgainst
  • the reserve for fossil fuel is running short, exploration of new energy resources is inevitable in the future
  • money spent in fighting against pollution due to the use of fossil fuel can be saved for new energy resource development
  •  
     

  
the world economy is based on energy from fossil fuels, so reducing their use would damage the economy
ForAgainst
     
  • global warming would damage the economy more
  •